<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Ipseity</title>
	<link>http://ipseity.blogsome.com</link>
	<description>Norm Friesen: 1. pron. Himself; truly himself; in his right mind. (OED)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>

	<item>
		<title>This blog has moved!</title>
		<description>	Please see newer posts at http://ehabitus.blogspot.com.

 </description>
		<link>http://ipseity.blogsome.com/2007/02/18/this-blog-has-moved/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Discursive Psychology and Educational Technology: Beyond the Cognitive Revolution</title>
		<description>	This new paper of this same title develops three  themes following up on an article I wrote in 2005 with Andrew Feenberg: &quot;Ed Tech in Reverse&quot;: Information Technologies and the Cognitive Revolution  (to be published in Educational Philosophy and Theory). These three arguments are:
	
	
	
1.

	
From the camera obscura through ...</description>
		<link>http://ipseity.blogsome.com/2007/01/21/discursive-psychology-and-educational-technology-beyond-the-cognitive-revolution/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Frog and the Bottle of Beer</title>
		<description>	 Slavoj Zizek provides an engaging commentary on the Time magazine &#8220;person of the year&#8221; for 2006 (&#8221;you&#8221;): The Guardian, Dec. 31, 06 
	The short piece picks up towards the end where Zizek clarifies his thesis with the perverse image of a frog in amourous embrace with a bottle of ...</description>
		<link>http://ipseity.blogsome.com/2007/01/12/the-frog-and-the-bottle-of-beer/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Myth of the Knowledge Economy</title>
		<description>	

						
		
	

Overeducated in the knowledge age?

		
	
	It is commonly asserted that &quot;knowledge,&quot; &quot;information&quot; or more abstractly, &quot;the networked&quot; or &quot;the postindustrial,&quot; are eponymous for our society, age or economy. These assertions, of course, are seen to bring with them urgent implications for all levels and forms of education–from the preparation of children ...</description>
		<link>http://ipseity.blogsome.com/2006/11/24/the-myth-of-the-knowledge-economy-2/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Learning Theories: The Philosophical Family Tree</title>
		<description>	I recently came across this diagram from G. Stahl that outlines the philosophical influences behind prominent English-Language learning theories.  It is definitely a good start, but like any overview, invites refinement (e.g. a lot more could go between Kant and constructivism than just Piaget, or between Hegel and situated ...</description>
		<link>http://ipseity.blogsome.com/2006/09/03/learning-theories-the-philosophical-family-tree/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Digital Maoism: Jaron Lanier on CBC - Podcast</title>
		<description>	Wikipedia is the biggest fish in what is becoming a very big pond of community developed websites. These are pages where the public, the online collective, act as volunteer editors responsible for gathering content from a number of sources. Some people call it Hive Mind. Jaron Lanier calls it Digital ...</description>
		<link>http://ipseity.blogsome.com/2006/08/28/digital-maoism-jaron-lanier-on-cbc-podcast/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>E-Learning Myth #2: Technology drives educational change</title>
		<description>	
The Myth: It is often said or implied that technology or technological change impact education. They are seen as acting as a kind of &#8220;disruptive force,&#8221; requiring the adaptation, transformation or sometimes even the elimination of educators and educational institutions alike. The assumptions behind such understandings are that technology drives ...</description>
		<link>http://ipseity.blogsome.com/2006/08/24/e-learning-myth-2-technology-drives-educational-change/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>E-Learning Myths: Introduction</title>
		<description>	There a number of claims, truisms or clich&eacute;s that are frequently taken as self-evident in e-learning discussions, presentations, funding proposals and papers. These frequently find pointed expression in buzzwords and catchphrases like “net generation” (e.g. Barone, 2005), “knowledge economy” (e.g. Gandel, Katz, Metros, 2004) or fixed “laws” of technological change ...</description>
		<link>http://ipseity.blogsome.com/2006/08/14/e-learning-myths-introduction/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>E-Learning Myth #1: The “Net Gen” Myth</title>
		<description>	The Myth: Unlike any other generation before it, the Net Generation (born since 1982) is said to be marked by characteristics that correspond to the technologies they so readily adopt and so proficiently utilize. This technology is described as “personal, multifunctional, wireless, multimedia, [and] communication-centric;” corresponding net gen characteristics or ...</description>
		<link>http://ipseity.blogsome.com/2006/08/14/p36/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Erkenntnisweisen in Alltag und Wissenschaft (Ways of knowing in Science and in Everday Life)</title>
		<description>	 Understandings of learning and education are clearly culturally contingent. German-language research in these areas follows different historical and thematic dynamics than its English-language counterpart.  Research in German appears more heterogeneous, and more explicitly philosophically- and historically- grounded. (See, for example, this attempt to map out this heterogeneity and ...</description>
		<link>http://ipseity.blogsome.com/2006/07/08/erkenntnisweisen-in-alltag-und-wissenschaft-ways-of-knowing-in-science-and-in-everday-life/</link>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
