Discursive Psychology and Educational Technology: Beyond the Cognitive Revolution
This new paper of this same title develops three themes following up on an article I wrote in 2005 with Andrew Feenberg: "Ed Tech in Reverse": Information Technologies and the Cognitive Revolution (to be published in Educational Philosophy and Theory). These three arguments are:
|
1. |
From the camera obscura through the "cinematograph" and now the computer, new technologies have provided metaphors for understanding how the mind works. This fact taks on special importance when these technology-based understandings of the mental are then used to discuss the educational use of technology. Consider these quotes from the early 20th century, and how technological metaphors of the mental (from mind maps to memes) operate in e-learning discourse today:
|
|
|
2. |
Research in discursive, or more generally, post-cognitive psychology can be carried out in three basic steps (from Lynch & Bogen, 2006 [PDF, 0.9 Mb]):
These steps assume that language is not transmission between information systems (as pictured, right), but a way of acting. |
|
|
3. |
Looking at actual uses of language shows that we also often treat language as action –not as the transmission of information. Looking at patterns in very specific, actual instances of conversation shows language use as a kind of work, as a way of accomplishing a set of tasks. Listen, for example, to these these "conversational openings" using the telephone (recorded and brilliantly analyzed by Schlegloff in the 1980’s): the_routine_as_achievement.mp3 (0.37 Mb). Comparing examples like these to "artificial" chatbot conversations, this paper illustrates how discursive and postcognitivst psychological inquiry into language and thought have direct applicability to the design and research of e-learning applications and projects. |
![]() |



Slavoj Zizek provides an engaging commentary on the Time magazine “person of the year” for 2006 (”you”): 